Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: new sub-species of Painted Jezebel

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Koh Samui, Thailand
    Posts
    4,446

    Default

    Thank you SK for the comment, but I am not an 'expert' ( I don't like that word). There is much I don't know and have to ask other Delias fanatics.

    Anyway, re D.h.hyparete. My initial thoughts. Anything is possible, but in this case I doubt it. The nearest D. h. hyparete gets to Singapore is, I think, W. Java (I haven't got my maps with me). It is not found on Sumatra, which would be the natural stepping stone for any expansion of that ssp.

    This is most likely either a misidentification, a deliberate introduction or an accidental one. I can accept the first, but if it is either of the latter two then it is regrettable, from the purity of ssp. point of view. From my observations on Koh Samui, where I think I have found both D.h. metarete and D. h. indica, I believe that the subspecies can interbreed where they meet and produce intermediate forms. If this is the case, I will have much work to do to see if these intermediates are fertile or not.

    My feeling is, don't go out with the intention to finding D. h. hyparete, you may have a VERY long wait.

    Could someone tell me what NSS is. I need to see the paper in which this observation was published.

    Les
    Delias Rule, OK (but not D.h.hyparete)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    5,576

    Default

    Les,

    Good morning to you and below links are for your info.

    http://www.nss.org.sg/groups_butterfly.html

    http://butterfly.nss.org.sg/home/index.html
    Chee Ming, Sum

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Koh Samui, Thailand
    Posts
    4,446

    Default

    Thank you for the links. I have now taken the opportunity to look at the article. It is NOT saying that the butterfly was found in Singapore, the photograph seems to have been taken to show comparison between H. h. hyparete and D.h. metarete. The article specifically says that the butterfly was shot in Indonesia and that D. h. metarete is the subspecies found in Singapore, which is quite natural.

    Les
    Delias Rule, OK

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    15,668

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Painted Jezebel View Post
    Thank you SK for the comment, but I am not an 'expert' ( I don't like that word). There is much I don't know and have to ask other Delias fanatics.
    Ok... a foremost authority on Delias then. Would that be better?

    Quote Originally Posted by Painted Jezebel View Post
    Thank you for the links. I have now taken the opportunity to look at the article. It is NOT saying that the butterfly was found in Singapore, the photograph seems to have been taken to show comparison between H. h. hyparete and D.h. metarete. The article specifically says that the butterfly was shot in Indonesia and that D. h. metarete is the subspecies found in Singapore, which is quite natural.
    Actually, the article didn't specifically say that the butterfly was shot in Indonesia, but leaves some vagueness about it. Not sure where SC heard/read about it, so let's just leave it at that. From our own experience, it's just that there have been cases of people importing pupae from overseas and releasing the adult butterflies here in Singapore - something that is debatable, as far as purist environmentalists are concerned.
    Khew SK
    Butterflies of Singapore BLOG
    Try not. Do, or do not. There is no try

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Koh Samui, Thailand
    Posts
    4,446

    Default

    I do not think 'debatable' is a word I would use in this respect. Irresponsible is how I would describe it. As I have posted before, Dryas julia (or iulia as I have been told to call it), is now common on the island. It is definately breeding here, I saw a newly eclosed male only yesterday, and now it will compete for the native passiflora foetida with our own native species such as Cethosia sp. OK, there is plenty around at the moment to accomodate both, but who can say what may happen in the future?

    There, my rant is over. I seem to be in a bad mood this morning. Probably due to withdrawal symptons of not having gone butt watching for nearly a week! Weather better today, so I will try and get out and relieve the tension.

    Anyway, Happy Labour Day everyone.

    Les
    Delias Rule, OK

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Simei
    Posts
    829

    Default

    I rem myself saying on somewhere I spotted something like that at Pasir Ris Mangrove area that looks like a sawtooth (jezebel-like) butterfly. But later, I think that that it must be a mistake when I saw something similar when I got it on the camera.

    Now, this brings back my doubts again So confirm the author shot it in SG or Indonesia?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Koh Samui, Thailand
    Posts
    4,446

    Default

    I have read the article again and again, and I have difficulty in reading it in any way other than it was shot in Indonesia. Yes it is vague, but I think the NSS would have made a bit more of a fuss if it had been found in Singapore. The only way to be sure is to contact Mr. Gan, as there is no forum on the site.

    Les
    Delias Rule, OK

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    15,668

    Default

    Let's not bother with "the other side". Such posts were probably meant to create some one-upmanship for NSS, and spawn such debates amongst us.

    As Les mentioned, no one said that it was shot in Singapore, so let's not jump to any conclusions.

    Thread Closed.
    Khew SK
    Butterflies of Singapore BLOG
    Try not. Do, or do not. There is no try

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Join us