Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Betong (Yala - Peninsular Thailand), 3 visits in April and June 2017

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Koh Phangan Thailand
    Posts
    1,226

    Default

    We examined the upper of both species and I can confirm the ID of the species from Betong.

    Funny thing is that upperside male cinesoides is same as that of the female johorensis.



    These are Drupadia cinesoides from Betong (© Satawan Atdhabhan)


    cinesoides.jpg




    and these are Drupadia johorensis from Betong mating (© Satawan Atdhabhan)


    johorensis 2.jpg

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    7,363

    Default

    Post 6.

    I presume the mating pair of johorensis is undoubted, ie that the pair have been caught & set or the uppersides of both sexes are seen & identical to the female johorensis.
    This is important because the one on the left which looks like the female is no different from the underside of the female cinesoides above it.

    If so, then the only difference is the leg band . the tibia is double black -banded in cinesoides & mostly single-banded in johorensis ,with the upper tibial band faint or missing.

    TL Seow: Cheers.
    Last edited by Psyche; 16-Aug-2017 at 02:21 AM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Upper Changi
    Posts
    2,873

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Psyche View Post
    Post 6.

    I presume the mating pair of johorensis is undoubted, ie that the pair have been caught & set or the uppersides of both sexes are seen & identical to the female johorensis.
    This is important because the one on the left which looks like the female is no different than the underside of the female cinesoides above it.
    I think the right one is female because females tend to have more intense orange.

    That said the females of both spp. are very difficult to tell apart from field shots because they are both a similar shade of orange ventrally and how intense this orange is can be subjective. For males, the contrast between the two is quite obvious
    Aaron Soh

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    7,363

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by atronox View Post
    I think the right one is female because females tend to have more intense orange.

    That said the females of both spp. are very difficult to tell apart from field shots because they are both a similar shade of orange ventrally and how intense this orange is can be subjective. For males, the contrast between the two is quite obvious
    I have thought so too that the left was male because the palpi 3rd segments were shorter.

    TL Seow:Cheers.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Koh Phangan Thailand
    Posts
    1,226

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Koh Phangan Thailand
    Posts
    1,226

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Koh Phangan Thailand
    Posts
    1,226

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Upper Changi
    Posts
    2,873

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Angiud View Post
    We examined the upper of both species and I can confirm the ID of the species from Betong.

    Funny thing is that upperside male cinesoides is same as that of the female johorensis.

    cinesoides.jpg

    These are Drupadia cinesoides from Betong (© Satawan Atdhabhan)
    I think you mean "male johorensis is same as that of female cinesoides"

    The ventral shots seem swapped; the paler orange one should be male, as their wing shapes also imply
    Aaron Soh

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Join us