Post 70.

1. https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/294828315
Female Quedara monteithi.

The females of Q. singularis and monteithi only differs slightly.
In Q. singularis the FW cellspot (part of the band) is wider and rectangular.
In Q. monteithi the FW cellspot is squarish.



2. https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/294828310
Too blur to ID properly but it does looks like P. serina.


3. https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/294828298
The underside view is difficult to deduce.
Looking at the larger FW bluish patch, Pratapa deva looks a better match.
See female from Ranong.
https://yutaka.it-n.jp/lyc4h/8h020020.html
Compare.(Note female ssp blanka have deeper blue.)
https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/A...lanka_minturna



4.https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/294828304
Probably Pyroneura flavia.

Three species with the veins broadly scaled orange can look very similar.

P. helena and natuna are very similar and were once classed as one species.
They both a an opalescent streak in space 5 on the FW.

P. helena.
https://thaibutterflies.com/Butterfl...oneura-helena/
P. natuna.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.co...0/DSC_0103.JPG
https://nlliew66butterflies.blogspot...uhstorfer.html

P. flavia is very similar but FW lacks the opalescent streak in space 5 in the male, weakly so in the female.
https://thaibutterflies.com/Butterfl...oneura-flavia/

This individual lacks the whitish opalescent streak on the FW.


5. https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/294828307
Darpa striata.

The darkly shaded UnH and the heavy FW spotting are that of Darpa.
https://yutaka.it-n.jp/hes/90600001.html



TL Seow: Cheers.