Revision.
This pic which strongly suggest T. aruna appear to be a T. pelea pic. which have been overcontrasted.
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/137292791
It is rather similar to this example.
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/55162408
TL Seow: Cheers.
Dear Doctor Seow,
I am confident these are Tanaecia genus, but i would like to hear your opinion given that you have some thoughts on other tanaecia in Singapore
1 - inat link - https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/152608903
2 - inat link - https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/152608885
3 - inat link - https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/152608883
Skipping rehards
Zicky
Zick Soh
Post 14.
All three are Tanaecia pelea.
To reiterate.
Tanaecia pelea.
HW arroheads midway or nearer the inner border.
Male with HW margin rounded as in the female.
Male HW arrowheads abbreviated, smaller.
Male & female.
https://wingscales.com/Nymphalidae/Tanaecia-pelea-pelea
Tanaecia palguna .
HW arrowheads nearer the margin.
Male with the HW arrowheads abbreviated & those on the FW relatively short.
Male HW tapers to the tornus.
Male.
https://inaturalist-open-data.s3.ama...8396/large.jpg
Probable female.
https://a4.pbase.com/g9/25/686825/2/...5.MwQKhqWz.jpg
Tanaecia munda
HW arrowheads nearer the margin
Male with the HW tapers to the tornus.
Male HW arrowheads long & well-defined as in the female.
Male.
https://singapore.biodiversity.onlin...7abbc0666c.jpg
Possible female.
https://a4.pbase.com/g6/25/686825/3/...3.q4HTrHyT.jpg
Taenecia aruna.
Arrowheads well-defined in white especially on the FW.
FW with two separated spots in space 2 & 3 ,
https://inaturalist-open-data.s3.ama...1792/large.jpg
TL Seow: Cheers.
Posting Permissions
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules