This article by Peter Smetacek 2012 shows he too considered the Indian Vagrant to be Vagrans sinha (not V. egista), sp. no 136.
http://www.threatenedtaxa.org/ZooPri...22857-2874.pdf
TL Seow
Power Member
This article by Peter Smetacek 2012 shows he too considered the Indian Vagrant to be Vagrans sinha (not V. egista), sp. no 136.
http://www.threatenedtaxa.org/ZooPri...22857-2874.pdf
TL Seow
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote