I didn't realised that the taxon distanti is now separated rom intermedia as a distinct species.

The dsf of M perseus in my previous is probably incorrect.

Even in dsf the alignment of the eyespots should remain the same. Thus since the 3 hindwing spots (their centre dots actually) are almost in alignment we can rule out M. perseus.

This leaves the dsf of M. intermedia & distant.

M. intermedia typically have 2 forewing spots , thus 2 dots in dsf; also the upper end of the white band on the hindwing is angled in (probably inconsistent feature).
Here is a valid dsf example.
http://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/185...sis-intermedia

This leaves the dsf of M. distanti to consider.

TL Seow
PS. It does get very confusing as I don't know which of the images on the net are correct, but I believed it is one of these , perseus, intermedia, & distanti.