#4. https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/238917767
Arhopala moolaiana.
Amphimuta group markings.
There is a tornal white dot & the markings markings & V spot is fat.
The upperside seem to show a female.
The tornal white dot means either A. norda or moolaiana.
A. norda have narrower marking & is much rarer.
UpF shows a uniform brown border of the FW margin.(resembles A. major.)
Confirmed A. norda.
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/238739817
#5. https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/238737285
Likely Baoris farri.
There is a full set of spots as in Baoris farri male.
https://yutaka.it-n.jp/hes/93210001.html
The B. oceia male typically have much reduced spotting & generally darker.
https://yutaka.it-n.jp/hes/93220001.html
#6.https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/238269416
Parnara bada.
Short antennae with thick clubs; No UpF cellspot; UpH with small irregular spots.
https://yutaka.it-n.jp/hes/93050001.html
#7. https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/238269415
Oriens gola.
FW band contiguous without darkened veins.
O. golopides .
FW subapical & cellspot detached & veins darkened.
https://thaibutterflies.com/Butterfl...ns-goloides-3/
#8. https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/237795036
Hyarotis adrastus .
Shape of cellspot is very variable.
#9. https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/237406744
Amphimuta group .There is no tornal white dot.
Either A. amphimuta or major .
Based on the well-shaped V spot this should be A. amphimuta .
Last edited by Psyche; 05-Sep-2024 at 01:26 AM .
Posting Permissions
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules