Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: ID requests - Sep 3, 2024

Threaded View

  1. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    7,368

    Default

    #4. https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/238917767

    Arhopala moolaiana.
    Amphimuta group markings.
    There is a tornal white dot & the markings markings & V spot is fat.
    The upperside seem to show a female.

    The tornal white dot means either A. norda or moolaiana.
    A. norda have narrower marking & is much rarer.
    UpF shows a uniform brown border of the FW margin.(resembles A. major.)
    Confirmed A. norda.
    https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/238739817



    #5. https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/238737285

    Likely Baoris farri.
    There is a full set of spots as in Baoris farri male.
    https://yutaka.it-n.jp/hes/93210001.html

    The B. oceia male typically have much reduced spotting & generally darker.
    https://yutaka.it-n.jp/hes/93220001.html


    #6.https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/238269416

    Parnara bada.
    Short antennae with thick clubs; No UpF cellspot; UpH with small irregular spots.
    https://yutaka.it-n.jp/hes/93050001.html



    #7. https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/238269415

    Oriens gola.
    FW band contiguous without darkened veins.

    O. golopides.
    FW subapical & cellspot detached & veins darkened.
    https://thaibutterflies.com/Butterfl...ns-goloides-3/



    #8. https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/237795036

    Hyarotis adrastus.
    Shape of cellspot is very variable.



    #9. https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/237406744
    Amphimuta group .There is no tornal white dot.
    Either A. amphimuta or major.
    Based on the well-shaped V spot this should be A. amphimuta.
    Last edited by Psyche; 05-Sep-2024 at 01:26 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Join us