ID confirmation - Arhopala epimuta

[DaveChiangMai]

Another Arhopala from southern Thailand, Bang Lang NP.
I assume this is A. epimuta though a few things do not fully match.
IS that ID correct please?
Thanks.

oakblue.JPG

[Psyche]

It is not A. epimuta.

A. epimuta; FW spot 4 shifted out; HW postfiscal spots 5, 6, & 7 staggered, spot 6 astride spot 5 & cellend bar. white tornal dot.
https://www.thaibutterflies.com/wp-c...a-1080x675.jpg
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-fZs6LPksM...e_field_01.jpg


It looks like A. hypomuta. but is not.
FW spot 4 shifted out; HW with tooth & white tornal dot.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-cVxMc39_bF...0/DSC_0213.JPG


Salient points.
Unusual specimen with small narrow markings.

1. FW & HW arrangement of spots as in amphimuta.
2. HW rounded ,without tooth or white dot. (eliminating amphimuta, major, norda , moolaiana & sceva .)
3.HW postdiscal band completely dislocated at vein 2. (eliminating zylda & stubbsi )
4. Submarginal spots largely discrete , triangular, & separated.

Two species fit the bill.

A. kurzi.
HW postdiscal band widely dislocated at vein 2. spots larger.
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-_vsUP_6bf...0/DSC_0683.JPG



This have to be Arhopala avathina. very rare.
There is a pix in the Biodiversity of Singapore Website.
Google seem to block me from it.
I can get the underside pic from the smartphone.
https://www.google.com/search?q=arho...wGh0__uVAk5MTM



TL Seow: Cheers.
PS. It is stated A. avathina have no FW basal cellspot & this has a small one.
So A. avathina is out.
This leads to the next three ,A, meyamuta, muta & moorei
Without further view it can only be assumed to be A. muta, the commonest,
Note this specimen is peculiar, with the markings very narrow.

[DaveChiangMai]

Many thanks for this. Indeed rare in Thailand.
This was causing me many problems to ID.