Doubtful IDs from Nepal

[Nawab]

Sir, could you look at this Erionota please?

1.jpg

[Psyche]

Post 120.

Male Erionota torus.


There are a lot of confusion with the Erionota spp.

E. torus. FW 30/36 mm.
FW margin strongly convexc, apex more pointed in the female.
Antennal club 1/2 white above in female & 1/2 to 2/3 white above in the male.
HW patch broad & more or less uniform width.
UpF apex may have white shading.
Male.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...a0fd691d-1.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eriono...-06-10-001.jpg
https://www.pbase.com/dancy/image/82916318
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...a_7/tbf208.jpg

Female.
http://www.butterflycircle.com/check...2012--0882.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...4950f711-2.jpg


E. thrax. FW 31/37 mm.
FW apex sharper & margin straight. UpF apical margin may be lightly shaded white.
Antennal club 1/2 white in female & 2/3 white in male.
HW patch relatively broad throughout.

Male.
http://www.butterflycircle.com/check...20-%20Khew.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...553af268-1.jpg

Female.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...unte_ag436.jpg
http://www.butterflycircle.com/check...2012--0060.jpg

.
E. acroleuca apicalis

Previously the continental population was given as E. acroleuca apex.
Taxon apex type location Luzon is now considered as a ssp or full species & is not aplicable to the mainland population (unless the Philippine & continental forms are considered the same.)
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/hes/92340010.html
There does not seem to be any article treating taxon apex as a separate species.
See PDF ,A taxonomic note on Erionota acroleuca.
https://www.google.com/search?q=erio...hrome&ie=UTF-8

FW sharp ,margin straight. UpF apical margin shaded white but may be brown.
Antennal club fully white above in the male & 1/2 white in the female.
HW with the pale patch much narrower in the upper half.
Smaller FW 29/31 mm.

Male.
https://www.thaibutterflies.com/wp-c...1-1080x720.jpg
http://www.butterflycircle.com/check...0-%20sunny.jpg

Female.
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-oGOIfwCnq..._female_01.jpg


Unusual form E. torus males with large white are on the club. HW patch partially narrower .Probably of hybrid origin with E. acroleuca.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...f86b3ed0-1.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...2e3adf8f-1.jpg



TL Seow: Cheers.

[Nawab]

Many thanks, sir. What do you think of this Callerebia?

3.jpg

2.jpg

[Psyche]

Post 122.

Callerebia hybrida.

Two species have prominent ocelli in space 1b & 2 & a UnH dark discal fascia which is strongly stepped at vein 5.

C. annanda.
HW discal fascia more diffuse , especially in the upper part..
HW submarginal fascia broad running into & connecting the two ocelli in space 1b & 2.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...eca0bcea-2.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...2bf0dc09-1.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/sp...lerebia-annada


C. hybrida.
HW discal fascia sharper, more linear.
HW submarginal fascia also more linear & runs short of connecting the two ocelli.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...3278ff25-1.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/sp...erebia-hybrida



TL Seow: Cheers.

[Nawab]

Thank you, sir. Those are great keys!

[Nawab]

Sir, could you check this Catochrysops?
1.jpg
2.jpg

[Psyche]

Post 125.

The two spwcies can be hard to judge in some cases.
The position of the costal spot can be ambiguous.
The text states in C. panormus the FW costal spot is adjoining the band ,meaning it is very close to it.
The upperside colouration is also hard to judge in photos.

Here are pictures of both.

C. panormus male.
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/lyc4/81010010.html

https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...db012a21-1.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...db012a21-2.jpg

https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...unte_ah952.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...unte_ah951.jpg

https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...kare_al137.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...kare_al136.jpg


C. strabo. male.
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/lyc4/81000001.html

https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...luri_ak117.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...luri_ak116.jpg


https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...a_7/tbe590.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...a_7/tbe589.jpg


In male C. strabo the FW submarginal chevrons are more flatten out so that the submarginal band have more level margins.
On the HW the submarginal chevrons are all rather broad.

In C. panormus male, the FW submarginal chevrons are strongly V-shaped.
On the HW the submarginal chevrons are all narrower.

From all the examples this individual is a C. strabo male . The upperside normally have darker outer streaks


The females of both species have UnH submarginal chevrons broad.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...luri_ak122.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...luri_ak123.jpg

https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...fe924dd5-1.jpg


TL Seow: Cheers.