Results 1 to 10 of 50

Thread: Butterfly Sightings in Hong Kong 2016

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    7,362

    Default

    Post 43.

    It is probable there are many more unrecorded species of butterflies in HK.

    102. The strongly bowed FW, dark antennae suggest Baoris.
    This appear to be correct for Baoris penincillata chapmani or sometimes elevated to Baoris chapmani.
    There is reduction in FW spots. Here only two subapicals ( spot 6 & 7) are present. Spots 4 & 5 are absent.
    The nos. of spots present are very variable.
    http://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/med...779ae1f0-2.jpg


    106. This has no spots on the HW & no FW subapical spots.
    Although it has some resemblance to P. bevani it is not it.
    P. bevani have small FW spots , UnH spots & antennae with pale areas.
    http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8468/8...efa00688_h.jpg

    Caltoris can sometimes have reduced spotting &the UnH is unspotted.
    This matches the description of Caltoris tenuis which Evans described as having greenish yellow hair on the body & similar scales on the UnH.

    Note this has some resemblance to Caltoris philippina which have sharper FWs & an ochreous green scaling on the underside.
    Caltoris philippina is unknown from the whole of the Indochinese region ie Thailand, Cambodia, Laos & Vietnam.
    It has a peculiar distribution, ie S. India, Sri Lanka, Malaya & eastwards to the Philippines, Sulawesi , PNG & the Solomons, missing the larger Sunda islands.
    Singapore examples.
    http://www.butterflycircle.com/check...ld_male_01.jpg
    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Gug8ilYe9Z..._BenJin_01.jpg
    http://www.butterflycircle.com/check...-Chir-4223.png


    TL Seow: Cheers.
    Last edited by Psyche; 09-May-2018 at 05:15 PM. Reason: clarification

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Toa Payoh (Singapore)
    Posts
    4,444

    Default

    107a : Ampittia virgata virgata

    107b :



    108: Odontoptilum angulata angulatum


    Need confirmation of the following shots.

    109. Potanthus confucius confucius


    110: Polytremis lubricans lubricans


    111. Zizeeria karsandra
    Last edited by Peacock Royal; 10-Aug-2018 at 12:03 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Toa Payoh (Singapore)
    Posts
    4,444

    Default

    Shot this at Lung Kwu Tan, Hong Kong in July 2023

    112: Which Tagiades ?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    7,362

    Default

    Tagiades menaka
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tagiad...ong_Kong_2.jpg

    Only two species in H.K.
    The other is T. latigiosa.
    https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/l...d7tbb8RULnspCA


    TL Seow: Cheers.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Toa Payoh (Singapore)
    Posts
    4,444

    Default

    Yes. I have shot both HK Tagiades species
    What puzzles me is the hindwing outer margin is not whittish in this picture.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    7,362

    Default

    Correction.


    112. Tagiades litigiosa.
    There are two tiny white spots in space 2 & 3.
    T. litigiosa can have both spots or only the upper spot 3.
    In wsf the HW marginal spots can form a continuous band.
    HW does not have a spot in space 1b .

    Valid example from N. Vietnam.
    Female (dsf) with FW spots in space 2 & 3.
    Male (partial wsf) with only spot 3 (faint)
    http://butterfliesvietnam.blogspot.c...snow-flat.html

    HK Full wsf with only FW spot 3.
    https://www.jungledragon.com/image/6...litigiosa.html

    T. menaka is said to have only one variable form.
    FW with only spot 3, no spot 2.
    HW with a diffuse spot in space 1b inside the marginal spots.
    https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/si...496c1f2b-1.jpg


    This one from Hk is misID'ed. Should be T. latigiosa .FW only spot 3; HW no spot in space 1b inside the marginal one.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tagiad...ong_Kong_2.jpg


    TL Seow: Cheers.
    PS. If I am not mistaken T. litigiosa is now correctly T. vajuna.
    Last edited by Psyche; 31-Jul-2023 at 01:09 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Join us