No 15 is right.
A good match for the female in MoB. Markings may varies a lot.
http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-6/...tiinae-1-9.php
TL Seow :Cheers.
No 15 is right.
A good match for the female in MoB. Markings may varies a lot.
http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-6/...tiinae-1-9.php
TL Seow :Cheers.
No. 14 Diduga flavicostata. Arctiinae.
Note the long simple antenna of Arctiinae.
From HK.
http://www.pbase.com/image/122744046
Taiwan.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bettaman/3994795709/
This Australian website appeared to be in error. (should be Cyclosiella sp.)
http://lepidoptera.butterflyhouse.co...ct/flavic.html
TL Seow![]()
Last edited by Psyche; 24-Feb-2014 at 11:37 AM. Reason: spelling
No. 7 . Most likely Nishada chilomorpha. Arctiinae.
The appearance is fairly typical of an Arctiinine.
The FW is completely unmarked.
Note on the left FW, the colour deepens/darkens towards the lower basal half.
On the lower or inner margin (dorsum) is a dark line between the lighter & darker areas.
These features will only match one species in MoB ie, Nishada chilomorpha.
(The left FW is partially damaged in the MoB image below.)
http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-7/...osiini_3_1.php
The only difference is that the image from MoB have a bit of dark border on the outer margin (termen).
It is quite difficult to compare low-res museum specimen image . The paratype specimen shown dates to 1977 & is in poor condition.
TL Seow![]()
No. 16.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/111006196@N05/12650936803/
Is there a size error here?
The only likely match seen is this.
http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-15...rrodes_3_1.php
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php...e?taxid=224755
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital...a%20renasa.htm
The size here is about 2cm body length.
The grey fasciation on the wings may be slight.
TL Seow![]()
There is no size error... The moth in that picture is small (about 6-8 mm in body length)... So, i think it is not Anereuthina renosa...
Here is the side view of this moth - http://www.flickr.com/photos/111006196@N05/12739447544/.
Last edited by Lanzz; 24-Feb-2014 at 02:37 PM.
No. 13.
These are correct images of Rhypotoses glebula. They closely matched the image in MoB.
The differently shaped fasciation, lack of the black discal spot & variegated patches makes no. 13 an unlikely match.
No. 13 is probably a species not recorded in Borneo.
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php...e?taxid=189583
TL Seow![]()
Here is the picture of moth of the same species with No. 13. But, the color of this one is paler...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/1110061...7163/lightbox/
Look like my pictures is not matched with the images of Rhypotoses glebula from boldsystems.org...
No. 13.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/111006196@N05/12651213384/
Although a typical Lymantrine, this one proves very difficult to ID.
If this moth is in MoB then it is very likely this.
http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-5/...miini_14_3.php
The markings resembles Euproctis but the fasciae are dark not pale.
The 'spot' & the inner fascia are diffusely broadened to the costa (forward margin).
As stated in the text the male is very variable & may be plain brown.
TL Seow![]()
No. 17
http://www.flickr.com/photos/111006196@N05/12650981423/
This is another Tortricid moth.
For example this European Acleris emergana shows the same distorted forward margin(costa)
http://www.hmbg.org/uploads/images/1...s-emargana.jpg
Another A. sparsana shows a similar wing pattern.
http://www.tuin-thijs.com/images/vli...ller-4-31-.jpg
TL Seow![]()