Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Some Moths That Need ID (Part 2)...

Threaded View

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    7,368

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lanzz View Post
    It is a very useful information...

    So, no. 3 is Hippotion rosetta right? At the first time, i though it is H. rafflesii or H. boerhaviae.
    - http://www.projectnoah.org/spottings/128266031
    Yes it is H. rosetta.

    The two, H. echeclus & H. rafflesii can be discounted by their relatively straight outer & lower margins .

    H. rosetta & boerhaviae are readily confused.
    The FW margins of H. rosetta is stated to be more pronounced than H. boerhaviae, but very difficult to judge.
    Note the FW pale band (with several parallel lines) is poorly defined & the dark band is narrow, compared to that of H. boerhaviae.

    I included this clarification because I noticed someone have ID'ed it as H. boerhaviae on the website.

    TL Seow
    PS. An example of the confusion between H. rosetta & boerhaviae.
    This normally reliable Australian site have it wrong. The poorly defined FW bands & strong dark shading(not always present) are typical H. rosetta.
    http://lepidoptera.butterflyhouse.co...i/boerhav.html
    Last edited by Psyche; 07-Jan-2014 at 08:25 PM. Reason: PS

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Join us