Sir, could you check this Nacaduba, please? Thought this was N. kurava euplea, the only 6 line one we have but the upperside wasnt transparent from any angle. Would this be N. beroe gythion?
Attachment 27329
Attachment 27330
Printable View
Sir, could you check this Nacaduba, please? Thought this was N. kurava euplea, the only 6 line one we have but the upperside wasnt transparent from any angle. Would this be N. beroe gythion?
Attachment 27329
Attachment 27330
This is rather difficult.
The upperside with the pale dusting suggest N. berenice.
The underside suggest N. kurava.
This need further checking.
Possibly hybrid between the two.
ID is based on the upperside in the male so this is most likely a form of N. berenice.
Nacaduba beroe male.
Dark striae within bands mostly obsolete.
Always without a spot above the midcell band, at the costa.
FW postdiscal band usually broken in the middle.
Upperside deeper violet blue.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...949da7a9-1.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...95727b2f-1.jpg
http://www.butterflycircle.com/check...lt_male_01.jpg
Nacaduba kurava. male.
Dark striae often weak in the mae.
Submarginal spots large rounded margins.
FW postdiscal band almost always straight & unbroken
Upperside deeper blue with a see-thru effect.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nacadu...iMFUpUnAC1.jpg
http://www.butterflycircle.com/check...ue-SunnyC2.JPG
Nacaduba berenice male.
Dark striae within bands well-developed.
Submarginal spots irregular , may be narrow or broad.
FW postdiscal band typically broken in the middle or crooked.
Upperside lavende blue with a frosted appearance.
http://www.butterflycircle.com/check..._male_800x.jpg
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ceLml99O5...u/DSC_0187.JPG
http://www.butterflycircle.com/check...obby%20Mun.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/F...e_(5)_male.jpg
TL Seow: Cheers.
Thank you, sir. I was thinking N. beroe gythion. N. berenice may not be found in east Nepal,and there seem to be pics of N. beroe on IFB with spot above midcell band. Matches with some example of N. berenice akaba which is N. beroe gythion now.
The absence of the costal spot above the mid-cell band is an almost certainty in the ID of N. beroe.
There are a number of errors in IFB.
N. berenice is a common species ranging from India to Australia.
Here are examples of the male N. beroe.
N. beroe gythion.
India.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...949da7a9-1.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...148de93d-1.jpg
Thailand.
https://thaibutterflies.com/wp-conte...duba-beroe.jpg
https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/N...onMUpUnAC1.jpg
N. beroe neon.
P. Malaysia.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-yS0EBTwvFo...0/DSC_0105.JPG
Singapore.
https://wanderingbutterflyeffect.fil...f39fce860b.jpg
N. beroe asakusa. Taiwan.
https://www.tbn.org.tw/taxa/69f43c68...4-2c1e21dbfdce
TL Seow: Cheers
PS[I] . Nacaduba berenice akaba Type location Borneo. There is no change in the status of this. The Bornean ssp of N. beroe is neon the same as in Sumatra, Malaya & Singapore.
Correction.
The upperside is too dark to be N. berenice.
The only explanation is there are two butterflies.
The upperside is that of N. beroe.
The underside shot is that of N. kurava.
TL Seow: Cheers.
No, sir. It's very much a single individual. No doubt on that. Perhaps not all kurava individuals are transparent. Or perhaps it's a hybrid.
Agreed. The underside is fairly typical for N. kurava.
Marked variations either as natural aberration or from gene introgression can occur.
In the old days collectors often keep dozens of specimens of a single species.
Invariably, a few would be found to be abnormally marked.
TL Seow: Cheers.
I left this thinking it's Erionota torus, but now they appear E. thrax to me. I feel so bad that I didn't take good shots.
Attachment 27331
Attachment 27332
Agreed. It is a male Erionota thrax.
The two can be quite confusing, in S.E. Asia where the difference is less marked.
It is advisable to ID the sex/gender first as this helps in the ID.
Male have the antennal club about 3/4 white.
Female havs the antennal club about 1/2 white.
From the 2nd pic it is a male.
Erionota thrax.
Males.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...c58ada48-1.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...553af268-1.jpg
Females.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...unte_ag436.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...f763c7c9-1.jpg
Erionota torus.
Males.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...2e3adf8f-1.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...f86b3ed0-1.jpg
Females.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...943df378-1.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...43351446-1.jpg
TL Seow: Cheers.
Thanks for the confirmation, sir. Could you please check this Jamides? Looks little different than the regular alecto.
Attachment 27337
Attachment 27338
Yes the female Jamides alecto. The UnF white striae are all broad.
Note the lowest stria of the postdiscal bnad hangs free, so this is not unique to J. caeruleus.
https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/J...aMFUpUnAC1.jpg
Female.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/maanay/39855109760/
Female J. caeruleus.
http://www.butterflycircle.com/check...race%20Tan.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jamide...sMFUpUnAC1.jpg
Female. J. elpis.
http://www.butterflycircle.com/check...obby%20Mun.jpg
http://www.butterflycircle.com/check...obby%20Mun.jpg
TL Seow: Cheers.
Thank you, sir. I need a serious confirmation on this one. Scobura isota isnt reported from Nepal before, and I found a bunch of these in east, near Sikkim in dry season of March. While I saw more than 10 individuals, I managed to photograph several and all were typical S. isota as per Evans '49. Question is, if this is enough or do I need genitalia, which isnt possible for me now.
Attachment 27340
Attachment 27341
Attachment 27342
Attachment 27343
Attachment 27344
Attachment 27345
Attachment 27346
Attachment 27347
They are all fairly typical dsf Scobura isota.
S. isota & cephala have been much confused.
Scobura cephala.
FW spot 4 always present.
UnH with a large rectangular spot in space 1b, in continuation of the spot in space 2 (In Evans' time space 1b is called space 1c .)
Dsf with lighter brown shadings beyond the spots. In wsf always deeply shaded brown.
See fieldshots at bottom of webpage.
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/hes/91670001.html
Scobura isota.
FW spot 4 usually absent.
UnH spot in space 1b absent or small & vestigial, often with a corresponding small spot in space 6.
Dsf unH ground entirely yellow.
WsF UnH with brown shading as in S. cephala.
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/hes/91680001.html
These should all be S. isota.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/sp...cobura-cephala
Also check the key here.
Page 2. key line 5 for S. cephala & isota.
Note: Space M3 is space 3, space CuA2 is space 1b.
https://www.researchgate.net/publica...ra_Hesperiidae
TL Seow: Cheers.
Thank you so much, sir. Also I came to know that S. cephala will never have spots reduced like in most of my individuals.
Sir, could you please look at this Potanthus and Melanitis? Could the Melanitis be M. zitenius?
1a
Attachment 27375
1b
Attachment 27376
2a
Attachment 27377
2b
Attachment 27378
Post 176.
1. Probably Potanthus nesta.
Potanthus is particularly difficult.
Three species with the abdominal end yellow can be eliminated. ie P. pava, confucius, & ganda.
Three species in which the HW band's upermost spot (4 + 5) is strongly projected out & FW spots 4 & 5 are detached or nearly so are out ie P. pallida, P pseudomaesa, & trachala.
P. rectifasciatus have a very large spot 6 connecting the band to spot 7.
https://live.staticflickr.com/4585/3...39db4bb7_z.jpg
P. dara is pale yellowish with FW spots 4 & 5 detached & a prominent HW spot 6 above. ( Description corrected.)
Male & Female. Correction : These two may be forms of P. pallida with a prominent HW spot 6.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...9fae298e-1.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...e65a3959-2.jpg
P. pallida S. India have only 5 spp. pava, confucius, pallida ,pseudomaesa & palnia.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...3bfc9c29-1.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...ac2df66b-3.jpg
Potanthus dara.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/26689187@N00/4852304343
https://www.flickr.com/photos/26689187@N00/4853857016
P. palnia have underside with a strong greenish ochreous shade.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...4df0929d-1.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/5832/3...6e1ae172_b.jpg
https://farm5.static.flickr.com/4536...eb33ea48_b.jpg
Potanthus lydia is mostly dark orange & the underside with obscure spots.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...07a03494-1.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...07a03494-2.jpg
Ssp fraseri.
https://c1.staticflickr.com/6/5648/2...e0f34ba0dc.jpg
https://inaturalist-open-data.s3.ama...jpg?1613963106
https://inaturalist-open-data.s3.ama...jpg?1545203091
P. juno have spot 8 absent or obscure; spot 5 smaller than spot 6.
http://thaibutterflies.com/wp-conten...o-1080x675.jpg
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-WroJpPq0U...Dart-KohCH.jpg
P. mingo have outer margin of HW band excavate with dark spots & HW band upper spot marked by a deep step on the inner margin.
Two males
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-f3wB2A2ujB...0/_MG_1531.jpg
http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b2...ngeSkipper.jpg
Female on the left. Male right is rather worn.
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-tFtROXZYi...us%2Bmingo.JPG
Potanthus flava
Generally the underside is marked by dark spots excavating the margins into spikes.
Ssp flavus (flava)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D9U9oeeU8AA8nmx.jpg
Potanthus sita.
Similar to P. flava.
Resembles P. trachala but spots yellow.
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/hes/92760001.html
Probable P. sita.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...2758f481-1.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/2742/4...0544c037_z.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...24470a0c-1.jpg
That leaves two.
Potanthus mara.
FW band continuous like P. confucius. Lower spots 1b, 2, & 3 are broad.
HW band inner margin with a moderate step. Spot in space 1b large.
Male Female. Correction: These two below are Telicota ohara.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...cf3e4734-1.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...fa0bf2df-1.jpg
Correct example of Potanthus mara, see fig 25 A & B in the images on the right.
https://www.google.com/search?q=pota...l97BA1-AM_o7pM
Probable P. mara male.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...1055485c-2.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...1055485c-1.jpg
Potanthus nesta;
FW band narrow with varying overlap.
HW band also rectangular without a prominent inner step; HW spot in space 1b narrow.
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/hes/92800001.html
Probable examples.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...24da1634-1.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...24da1634-2.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...7cee7e8b-2.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...7cee7e8b-1.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...dd958ef7-2.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...dd958ef7-1.jpg
PS. Potanthus nesta is often confused as P. confucius.
P. confucius dushta Male. Note the abdominal end is yellow. In P. nesta it is black.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/pr...H25DpUGQab2LeP
https://www.thaibutterflies.com/wp-c...s-1080x717.jpg
Post 176.
2, Melanitis zitenius.
M. leda; costa gradual curvature.
HW tails at vein 2 & 4 short, about equal length.
WSf with prominent eyespots.
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/sat/40010001.html
M. zitenius, Costa gradual curvature.
HW tai at vein 4 2-3 X that at vein 2.
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/sat/40030010.html
M. phedima.Costa strongly arched giving the FW a more rounded look.
HW tail at vein 2 a small knob.
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/sat/40020020.html
TL Seow: Cheers.
Dear sir,
Could you please check this Celaenorrhinus sp. for me? It looks very much like C. leucocera but has space 1b spot. C. pyrrha is another candidate but this individual lacks pale spots beyond sp 1b spots.
Attachment 27385
Attachment 27386
Post 179.
It has to be C. leucocera with a minor aberration.
BY following Evans' keys in two ways.
1. Assuming the sub=basal spot in space 1b is valid.
Key 1a, 1b, 1c, 3a(id), 5a(3b) 6a(5), 9a( 6b), 11 (9b) a dead end C. pero.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/sp...norrhinus-pero
C. pyrrha is out Key 6b to 9. as the antenna is chequered & only the club white.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...c174a712cc.jpg
2. Assuming the sub-basal spot is a minor aberration.
Key 1a to 12a(1c) to 15a (12c).
This include 3 species.. C patula, leucocera & putra.
It matches C. leucocera very well.
TL Seow; Cheers.
Thank you so much, sir. Could you please check this Potanthus? Looks a little different than P. pseudomaesa.
Attachment 27390
Attachment 27391
Post 181.
This does look good for Potanthus pseudomaesa clio.
Evans state of pseudimaesa that the FW spots 4 & 5 are detached, but this less so in ssp clio.
P pseudomaesa. small FW 12mm.
Abdominal end broadly black banded.
FW spots 4 & 5 detached or almost so, small overlap in ssp clio.
HW upperside with the veins variably darken, but not on the underside.
Ssp pseudomaesa.
Sri lanka.
https://slbutterflies.lk/storage/app...1492795816.JPG
India.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...9112ea6e-1.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...8ff14c0e-1.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...1a69905b-3.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...1a69905b-4.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...otra_ak402.jpg
Ssp clio. Small overlap of spots 4 & 5 ( variable ).
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/hes/92740010.html
Ssp. clio H. K. female.
https://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/cons...seudomaesa.jpg
Very similar.
Potanthus mingo. FW 12mm.
FW spots 4 & 5 with small overlaps ,may be deatched above.
HW band ,veins not darken above & below.
UnH band with deep inner step & outer margins strongly edged with dark spots & excavated.
All Singapore examples.
https://inaturalist-open-data.s3.ama...3/original.jpg
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-f3wB2A2ujB...0/_MG_1531.jpg
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-lQGrUAdKox...0/_MG_1529.jpg
Female left, male right.
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-tFtROXZYi...us%2Bmingo.JPG
May be confused.
P. confucius. FW 12-13mm.
Abdominal end yellow with a thin black line.
FW band continuous & uninterrupted in the male veins not dark (variable in ssp diana.), band may be detached above in female.
HW spot 6 absent or small.
Ssp. diana.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...bf352d12-1.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...gale_ai381.jpg
SSp dushta. Band more irregular.
https://www.projectnoah.org/spottings/16984275
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/hes/92790010.html
Potanthus pava, FW 15mm.
Abdominal end yellow with a narrow black band wider than in confucius.
FW band may be narrow or wide continuous as in P. confucius.
HW with a large spot 6 , more distinctive on the underside.
May have a yellow patch at the base of FW space 2 as in Telicota colon.
UnH spot 6 large, band edged in thin black lines.
Broad band form.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...82f9fd27-1.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...7f0e8a61-1.jpg
Naarow band form Note unh large spot 6 & black edgings.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...d7712114-1.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...d7712114-2.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...d7712114-3.jpg
Potanthus trachala. FW 14-15mm.
Abdominal end with black band.
FW spots 4 & 5 with no overlap.
Spots 2 & 3 narrow, with concave margins in the male.
HW upper spot strongly projected out.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...c574efd4-1.jpg
Singapore.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/8c/bd...b0db7b591d.jpg
http://www.butterflycircle.com/check..._female_01.jpg
TL Seow: Cheers.