Printable View
Post 17.
3. Likely male Quedara monteithi.
Wings are unmarked; labial palps bulging. N other match seem possible.
4. Notocrypta clavata female.
UnF white band extend broadly to the costa margin.
The white spot in space 4 is sometimes present, & is not diagnostic of N. paralysos.
https://thaibutterflies.com/Butterfl...rypta-clavata/
Post 17.
5. Halpe zema.
The band is yellowish & the outer margin have deep incisions.
https://thaibutterflies.com/Butterflies/halpe-zema/
Halpe ormenes.
The band is white & the incisions are smaller.
https://www.butterflycircle.com/chec...Bene%20Tay.jpg
6. Koruthailos sindu.female.
The females of the two are very similar.
Both have the orange band broad & reaching the costa .(The male rubecla have a narrow band not reaching the costa.)
K. sindu. 3rd sement of labial palp short ,like a button.
Female.
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-riMYGNwuH...0/DSC_0194.JPG
K. rubecula female. Palpus 3rd segment long.
http://www.jamiun.com/category/macro...banded-velvet/
Post 17.
No 7. Isma bononiamale.
HW with a series of hyaline spots some long in the male.
Underside pale ochreous, abdomen whitish & dark bands.
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/hes/91990001.html
https://thaibutterflies.com/Butterflies/isma-bononia/
No. 8 CORRECTION: Both pix are of Hidari doesoena.
1st pic Hidari irava.
The sharper FW & the white dot in the HW cell.
https://butterflycircle.blogspot.com...uary-2019.html
2nd pic is a different species unknown
The large orange-yellow spots does not match any species.
9. Acerbas species . Correction : Probably not Acerbas or Unkana as white band seem to extend across both wings.CORRECTION 2: Acerbas martini
The large white UnH white band is characteristic.
Three Bornean species very similar.
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/hes/92510001.html
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/hes/92500001.html
Acerbas selta Bornean endemic.
Post 17.
10 a Choaspes stigmatus.(Formerly under C. plateni.) Correction: Choaspes subcaudatus.
The black bar in HW space 1b, within the fold does not extend to near the margin.
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/hes/90300020.html
https://thaibutterflies.com/Butterfl...pes-stigmatus/
b, if it is certain the same individual then it is C. stigmatus.
If not certain then probably another species.
C. subcaudatus.
Black bar within the fold long extending to near the margin.
It is sometimes visible near the inner margin.
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/hes/90330010.html
https://wingscales.com/Hesperiidae/C...atus-crawfurdi
Post 17.
11. Celaenorrhinus putra.
C. putra & leucocera are rather similar but C. leucocera is not found in Borneo.
The FW white band does not reach the costal margin.
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/hes/90480010.html
12. Tagiades ultra.
FW lacks a spot in space 3.
HW marginal spots large & regular.
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-qO-SYyCXb...t_Sunny_01.jpg
Thank you Dr Seow for all the IDs so far, just to clarify:
No. 8 both are the same butterfly, just that my friend had a clearer underside shot compared to mine. Could it be Gangara sanguinnocculus? The size was big enough that its definitely not possible to be H.irava.
No. 9 perhaps the resolution or angle of the uploaded picture is unclear, but when I zoomed in on the original shot, the white band is only on the HW, so I think most likely it is a Acerbas sp.
No. 10 Both are certainly the same individual.
Post 18.
The forms of Euploea in Borneo tend to have reduced spotting.
13. a & b Euoloea camaralzeman.
Large size with long FWs, & small spots mainly on the FW.
Kubah.
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-BXTkI8B-o...2BDSC_7582.jpg
Compare Singapore example.
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-bsNgjRN0n...alayancrow.jpg
c. Euploea mulciber.
FW bluntly truncate; HW with at least one or thin streak in the discal area.
India.
https://indiabiodiversity.org/files-...lciber/210.jpg
Singapore.
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-kQVbdQw4O...t_Sunny_03.jpg
14. Prosotas bhutea.
The 2nd pic shows the FW midcell band not extending below the cell.
TL Seow: Cheers.
[QUOTE=LJK1410;136885]Thank you Dr Seow for all the IDs so far, just to clarify:
No. 8 both are the same butterfly, just that my friend had a clearer underside shot compared to mine. Could it be Gangara sanguinnocculus? The size was big enough that its definitely not possible to be H.irava.
No. 9 perhaps the resolution or angle of the uploaded picture is unclear, but when I zoomed in on the original shot, the white band is only on the HW, so I think most likely it is a Acerbas sp.
I cant see how 8 a & b can be the same individual.
For example there is a subapical spot that cannot be seen in a.
The upperside spots does not match G. sanguinocculus.
The spots a FW cellspot, a spot in space 2 & 3 & space 1b . Also the subapical spot is not found in Gangara.
The number of spots match that of Hidari but the main spots seem way too large.
Also the underside HW white dot is quite diagnostic of Hidari irava since no other skipper seem to have it.
9 could also be unkana myrheca.
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/hes/92460001.html
TL Seow: Cheers.
The upperside of 8 b matched this species but I have no idea if this is found in Borneo.
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/hes/92480001.html
TL Seow: Cheers.
Confirmation.
Hidari doesoena is recorded from Borneo.
The underside HW also has white dot as in H. irava.
So, undoubtedly the upperside & underside match H. doesoena.
Fleming's book shows both sides clearly H190.
TL Seow: Cheers.