IDs needed

[atronox]

The part of the band in space 1b (beside the grey-green patch) is usually somewhat straight as in manea but may varies.

It's this character that made me sure it wasn't scintilla. This portion in manea and scintilla are more or less straight and following the same orientation as the rest of the band above it whereas in varuna the same portion is arched

[Psyche]

It's this character that made me sure it wasn't scintilla. This portion in manea and scintilla are more or less straight and following the same orientation as the rest of the band above it whereas in varuna the same portion is arched

Quite rightly so.
However some variation always occur.
The other factors are R. varuna is rather dark on the underside, & the HW band & cellend bar are so close they usually touch.
http://nlliew66butterflies.blogspot....na-orseis.html

The Bornean book on Lycaenids also give a good match, Page 67/74, L355.
http://www004.upp.so-net.ne.jp/jamid.../borneo-e.html

It also give a good match to this male labelled as R. dieneces in the past.
The FW band has a distinct bent, & the ground colour is olive brown which has a hint of green.
This just would not match any of the known males in Singapore.
http://www.butterflycircle.com/check...0Ben%20Jin.jpg


TL Seow: Cheers.
PS. There are examples of R. varuna from other areas in which the underside is pale eg. India ( HW band & cellend bar touching)..
The ID of R. scintilla may be a bit premature without further observations.
You could still be right . It may turn to be a form of R. varuna.

[atronox]

Maybe an unusually pale female? Too bad we don't know the extent of variation of these spp.