Are the FW postdiscal spot5 and 6 alined enough to make this a  M.symethus IMG-20220515-WA0027.jpg 
				 
			 
			
		 
			
				
			
				 
			
			
			
		 
	 
	
	 
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
				
				
		
			
				
					You do have an interesting one here.Miletus biggsii. http://yutaka.it-n.jp/lyc2/80260001.html https://calbutterfliesworld.blogspot...brownwing.html https://www.flickr.com/photos/digimania2009/3845385600 http://www.butterflycircle.com/check...llen%20Tan.JPG https://static.inaturalist.org/photo.../original.jpeg Miletus gopara. http://yutaka.it-n.jp/lyc2/80250001.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miletu...raMUpUnAC1.jpg http://v3.boldsystems.org/pics/BOPMB...1341158498.JPG http://nlliew66butterflies.blogspot....niceville.html Miletus gaesa .http://yutaka.it-n.jp/lyc2/80213001.html http://www.butterflycircle.com/check...llen%20Tan.JPG Miletus symethus. http://yutaka.it-n.jp/lyc2/80270010.html https://nss.org.sg/butterfly/photohi...s_symethus.jpg https://static.inaturalist.org/photo...982/large.jpeg http://www.butterflycircle.com/check...nius---Sim.jpg http://www.butterflycircle.com/check...562-copy-4.jpg http://www.butterflycircle.com/check...hee%20Beng.jpg It is either the male M. gopara or gaesa.   M. gopara  but there are no supportive pix of the distinctive female found.However, in flight M.gopara   have a prominent white band while M. gaesa  is plain brown. PS . Most likely the male Miletus gaesa.  
				 
			 
			
		 
			
			
			
				
					Last edited by Psyche; 16-May-2022 at 12:59 PM .
				
				
			 
			
			
				
			
			
			
		 
	 
	
	 
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
				
				
		
			
				
					Thank you Dr Seow.P5150079.jpg P5150068.jpg P5150091.jpg 
				 
			 
			
		 
			
				
			
			
			
		 
	 
	
	 
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
				
				
		
			
				
					Post 3.M. gopara. M. biggsii. M. biggsii  the FW postdiscal spot 6 is shifted out quite distinctly from spot 5, but there are variation & there may be examples where it is in line or almost so.https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/82286683 https://inaturalist-open-data.s3.ama...171/large.jpeg https://inaturalist-open-data.s3.ama...6092/large.jpg https://inaturalist-open-data.s3.ama...669/large.jpeg M. gopara & gaesa  still exist. M. gopara  with its distinctive 'tail' is still identifiable from the underside, but no such image is found. 
			 
			
		 
			
			
			
				
					Last edited by Psyche; 18-May-2022 at 12:05 AM .
				
				
			 
			
			
				
			
			
			
		 
	 
	
	 
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
				
				
		
			
				
					In comparing the larva of this with that of M. biggsii there is some differences.M. biggsii  from BC checklist.http://www.butterflycircle.com/check..._L4_8mm_01.jpg M. biggsii  larva there is a black squarish patch in segment 5 which would be the 2nd abdominal segment. M. biggsii , assuming the larva & the adult are the same. 
			 
			
		 
			
				
			
			
			
		 
	 
	
	 
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
				
				
		
			
				
					Yes. I notice that my larva has greenish inside between segment - something I did not notice in my previous M.biggsii larva.
				 
			 
			
		 
			
				
			
			
			
		 
	 
	
	 
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
				
				
		
			
				
					Good luck if you can rear the larva to adulthood. 
			 
			
		 
			
				
			
			
			
		 
	 
	
	 
	
	
	
	 
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
				
				
					
				
		
			
				
					Agreed. It is a typical male M. biggsii.  
			 
			
		 
			
				
			
			
			
		 
	 
	
	 
		 
		
		
	
 
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		
		
			
				 
			
				
	
		You may not  post new threads 
		You may not  post replies 
		You may not  post attachments 
		You may not  edit your posts 
		  
	 
	
	Forum Rules