Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: 40D High ISO Test shots

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    Posts
    7,512

    Default 40D High ISO Test shots

    Some quick and dirty High ISO test shots on the 40D , in camera Noise Reduction Off , from raw to Jpeg , cropped , resized no post processing done.

    All the shots were taken handheld in the shade with marginal lighting.

    Looks pretty good to me, in such trying condition, as far as noise level is concerned at ISO 3200.

    AF on the slow boat like the T180 has improved noticeably on the 40D body.

    The Plane was the first customer on my 40D !

    #1 ISO 1000 1/60 F/7.1

    #2 ISO 3200 1/120 F/10

    #3 ISO 3200 1/30 F/9

    #4 ISO 1250 1/250 F/5.6

    #5 ISO 3200 1/100 F/7.1

    #6 ISO 3200 1/125 F/8
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Sunny

    ~~When the Going Gets Tough, the Tough Get Going~~

    Sunny's Facebook on Butterflies!

    ~

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Jurong East
    Posts
    1,502

    Default

    Good shots of The Plane and the Branded Imperial, Sunny. Noise appears in dark background especially in ISO3200.
    Richard

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Toa Payoh (Singapore)
    Posts
    4,440

    Default

    Wah, you shot a Plane again.
    I feel that noise level is quite acceptable to me at IS03000

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    The Little Red Dot
    Posts
    95

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peacock Royal View Post
    Wah, you shot a Plane again.
    I feel that noise level is quite acceptable to me at IS03000
    If the picture was shown in full size, the noise level is not acceptable because all the noise will appear very clearly. However, if the image size was reduced, the noise could not been seen clearly.

    Earlier, I have started a thread at Clubsnap, regarding guessing the ISO setting:
    http://forum.clubsnap.org/showthread.php?t=293244

    When the picture was reduced, you can't really see the noise.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    4,657

    Default

    seems like rare butts like Plane & Brown Awl being attracted by your new cam

    Added yr Brown Awl to the checklist, it's the 2nd photo that shoot from the wild.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    Posts
    7,512

    Default

    SC,

    That Brown Awl is very dark , it was taken purely to check out the ISO of the 40D.

    This one might be better , the same guy shot at ISO 500 1/60s F/11. rotated 180 degrees.

    Attached Images Attached Images
    Sunny

    ~~When the Going Gets Tough, the Tough Get Going~~

    Sunny's Facebook on Butterflies!

    ~

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    941

    Default

    Great Shots Sunny!
    Love the shot with the skipper in the air
    I could never capture such a shot with the wings freezed in motion

    James Chia
    View my photos

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    5,576

    Default

    Sunny,

    I find the JPEG file processed by my 1D2 is better than the JPEG which I convert from RAW, at least the noise level is very high if I am to convert from RAW to JPEG.

    Did you try shooting JPEG and what's the photos turn out?

    Anyway, the photos shot with 40D's high ISO look promising!

    Chee Ming, Sum

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    Posts
    7,512

    Default

    CM,

    Still experimenting....

    It appears that the 40D in camera high ISO NR is very effective when taken in Jpeg .

    Here is one that was shot at ISO 3200 at DPReview

    and

    the 100% crop of the original image
    Sunny

    ~~When the Going Gets Tough, the Tough Get Going~~

    Sunny's Facebook on Butterflies!

    ~

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    Posts
    7,512

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Common Mime View Post
    Sunny,

    I find the JPEG file processed by my 1D2 is better than the JPEG which I convert from RAW, at least the noise level is very high if I am to convert from RAW to JPEG.
    CM,

    Just found out that the Raw processor in Photoshop and DPP follows a different algorithm from the in Camera JPEG processor .

    However , the Zoombrowser Raw Image Task (RIT) has the same algorithm as the in camera processor .

    If you use the RIT to convert to JPEG the image quality should be identical to the JPEG output from the camera .

    I took some shots in Raw+JPEG fine and the JPEG images from the camera is very much useable without much PP.


    Sunny

    ~~When the Going Gets Tough, the Tough Get Going~~

    Sunny's Facebook on Butterflies!

    ~

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Join us