I kindly request this identification for what i suspect is Zographetus species, Zographetus ogygia. The photo credit goes to Nicholas, with his remarkable and outstanding photography.
When it becomes very worn as here the appearance can be confusing.
Although the HW have a reddish tone the overall markings are closer to Z. doxus.
I would put it this is more likely to be Z. doxus male.
Dear Doctor Seow,
I was scrolling through forums and was reading the ID features for amathusia species, would this, based on the notched 4th brown bae in between the veins, be a bicolor palm king?
Inat link - https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/143724495
The recent observation from Kent Ridge is definitely not A. phidippus. https://static.inaturalist.org/photo...502/large.jpeg
It looks like a female A. perakana.
The FW is not sharp as in the male.
However, there are examples of A friderici from Ubin having the HW 4th band very narrow & broken.
So it is uncertain whether this is A.perakana or friderici.
i was looking through inat and i realise there are two species of white tipped skipper,Erionota hiraca and Erionota acroleuca. Do you know what are the differences or why is there a species shift which i may have missed out?
As often in taxonomy there are a lot of shifts & turns, & this one have a fair bit.
1881 Wood-Mason & De Niceville described taxon acroleucus from the Andamans.
In the same year (1881) Moore also described a male as hiraca from the Andamans.
de Jong & Treadaway in 1992 thought Moore', name have priority, but this was later proven wrong by later researchers.
Thus the correct name would have been Erionota acrolueca (gender shift to feminine gender).Synonym hiraca.
Semper described taxon apex from Luzon, Philippines in 1892.
This was considered a subspecies of acroleuca.
This taxon apex was applied to all the forms in SE Asia.
Evans described taxon apicalis from Bassein ,Myanmar in 1932, & this name falls as a synonym of apex.
de Jong & Treadaway 1992 judged taxon apex to be distinct & different from the mainland population, elevating it to a new species.
The population in SE Asia is given the next available name ,ie Evans' apicalis.
Thus the population from SE Asia becomes Erionota acroleuca apicalis.
Some researchers also suggest the mainland population (taxon apicalis ) is different from that in the Andamans (taxon acroleuca.).
Thus the current situation if verified by DNA analysis.
Reply With Quote
