Doubtful IDs from Nepal

[Nawab]

That's a great point! Thank you so much, sir!

[Nawab]

Some Pedesta?
1.jpg

[Psyche]

Post 89.

It should be Ochlodes brahma.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...8936be426b.jpg
O. siva have black lined spots.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/#!/tx/334-Ochlodes


Pedesta masuriensis have white FW spots.
P. panda & pandita have obscure or obsolete HW spots.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/tx/304-Pedesta


TL Seow: Cheers

[Nawab]

Thank you, sir. Looks right, but the antennal club is very different. Here's my Ochlodes brahma for comparison.

2.jpg

[Psyche]

In the post 89 shot there is a severe perspective distortion.

The antenna & wings are stretched out to the left & right as in a wide-angle shot.


TL Seow: Cheers.

[Nawab]

That is possible, thank you sir!

[Nawab]

In response to Post 89.
The confusion grows. I found another individual but without HW spots, same place and same date and time. But I had apparently IDed this as Pedesta pandita, so was in a different folder. This leads me to think that Post 89 was same species with HW spots. Angle distortion seems weird since I have many pics of these individuals with same morphology. Could you share your thoughts, sir?
2.jpg

[Psyche]

Some Pedesta?
1.jpg

Both shots show the same distortion ie the body is too long.

I think if the camera is set on wide angle for scenery shots, using the macro mode for closeup would cause the subject to be stretched out laterally ie left & right.
However, I will need a camera pro to comment on this.

It is possible both are of the same species.

In pic post 89 it is definitely a male (abdominal end, FW rounded apex & straight termen)
P. pandita can be ruled out as the male antenna is tipped orange & have a white spot.
Male P. pandita.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...00375cb7-2.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...53f557fe-1.jpg
Female ;FW apex more pointed, termen convex, longer body profile.Antenna without a white dot.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...529b5547-1.jpg


P. panda is not known to have HW spot.
It does not look quite right for Ochlodes brahma.


In a search for something similar, this appear to match Pedesta (Thoressa) masuriensis tali.
In the taxon tali the FW spots are yellow & the HW range from spotless to a variable number. The antenna is more gradual.
You may download the pdf, page 199, images 14 (spotless HW) & 15.
Not sure if this is possible. Zobodat pdf article.
https://www.google.com/search?q=note...hrome&ie=UTF-8

Author Hao Huang state that tali is so different that it is probably a different species.
HOwever it is found farther to the east in Sichuan & Yunnan.


TL Seow: Cheers.

[Nawab]

Thank you, sir. I found a similar variant of Pedesta recently. Comparison with typical Pedesta masuriensis given for reference.
Typical Pedesta masuriensis.
1a.
5.jpg
1b.
4.jpg
HW spots missing, upper FW spots less compact, and background more brownish, almost like in P. pandita.
2a.
2.jpg
2b.
3.jpg

[Nawab]

Could you look at this Neptis as well, sir? It seems like Neptis capnodes pandoces to me.
1.jpg