All three are Lasippa heliodore females.
The delineation of the tongue in black ,stronger in heliodore & weaker in tiga works fairly well in P. Malaysia & Singapore.
Elsewhere it is not so reliable.
The width of FW submarginal spot 3 is still the best guide. The width is stated in the set specimen.
Lasippa tiga FW submarginal spot 3 is always at least 2X wider than that of spot 4 above it.
Male ( FW band running wide on the lower margin.
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-CP7lwgaOS...0/DSC_0279.JPG
https://www.butterflycircle.com/chec...20-%20Khew.jpg
Female with FW band narrow on the lower margin.
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/_rzo8wjfyC...HenryKoh_c.jpg
Pair ,male on the left.
https://live.staticflickr.com/7120/7...8ab5b131_b.jpg
Others.
http://nlliew66butterflies.blogspot....iga-siaka.html
Ssp camboja with narrow markings.
https://thaibutterflies.com/wp-conte...a-1080x675.jpg
L. heliodore ;The female is easily confused with L. tiga .
Male FW submarginal spot 3 a little wider than spot 4 or about equal.
https://www.butterflycircle.com/chec...race%20Tan.jpg
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-dCiPo215I...car-LokePF.jpg
Female have the FW submarginal spot 3 1.5X the wide of spot 4 above it.
Pairs with the male on the left, female on the right.
https://www.butterflycircle.com/chec...20-%20Loke.jpg
https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3537/...e6a4f2a703.jpg
TL Seow: Cheers.
Last edited by Psyche; 28-Mar-2020 at 08:01 AM .
Posting Permissions
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules