-
18-Oct-2019, 12:08 PM
#11
Btw, gorgeous photos so far! It's been a joy to look through them and I'm looking forward to what else you'll post!
cheers
Jonathan
-
18-Oct-2019, 12:30 PM
#12
Thanks, Jon for the ID confirmation on Pithauria murdava
Can't wait to see your photos too!!
Loh Mei Yee
-
18-Oct-2019, 10:35 PM
#13
-
18-Oct-2019, 10:57 PM
#14
-
19-Oct-2019, 06:22 PM
#15
Post 14.
1. Celatoxia marginata.Female.
Among the genera with a white dot at the antennal tip include Celastrina, Udara ,Celatoxia, Lestranicus & Callenya.
C. lavendualris have spots with white halos, while C. argiolus have small spots.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...5248938d-1.jpg
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...164a70e4-1.jpg
This one have heavy postdiscal spots so most of the other genera can be excluded.
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/#!...llenya-melaena
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Callen...yaFUpUnAC1.jpg
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/lyc4/80750001.html
Oreolyce archena is very similar but the antenna does not have a white dot & HW has an extra spot at the base of space 1b.
http://nlliew66butterflies.blogspot....rbet-1940.html
This leave C. marginata which has heavy postdiscal markings,
https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/sp...oxia-marginata
2. Nacaduba beroe male; Note the costal spot above the mid cell band is missing (similar to I. helicon)
Last edited by Psyche; 20-Oct-2019 at 07:56 AM.
-
19-Oct-2019, 06:29 PM
#16
3 Udara placidula.
Submarginal lunules present; HW spot 7 large, darker than others ;Underside dark dhaded.
https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/U...aMFUpUnAC1.jpg
http://nlliew66butterflies.blogspot....rbet-1937.html
Udara cyma is similar but not found in ChiangMai.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Udara_...ioti,_male.JPG
http://www004.upp.so-net.ne.jp/jamid...Phil/cyma2.jpg
3. Jamides celeno.
J. pura have long silvery side bars on the black spot.
https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5494/...65d57a1b_c.jpg
4 & 5 are correct.
TL Seow: Cheers.
-
19-Oct-2019, 11:51 PM
#17
Loh Mei Yee
-
21-Oct-2019, 03:42 PM
#18
-
21-Oct-2019, 08:20 PM
#19
Post 18.
Yes they are both Kallima inachus siamensis.
They can be quite confusing.
It is impossible to ID from the underside pattern, as it is so variable.
K. inachus; FW apex with a small pointed tip & HW tail longer.
HW tail nearly as long as the lower distal margin from vein 2 (where it is strongly angled) to the the tornus.
Upperside orange band inner border with a series of deep well-defined indentations.
https://thaibutterflies.com/wp-conte...1-1080x675.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kallim...sect_World.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/F....inachus.2.jpg
https://www.learnaboutbutterflies.co...%20inachus.htm
K. limborgi FW apex in the male not produced to a tip but does so in the female.
HW tail shorter , shorter than the lower distal margin from vein 2 to tornus.
Upperside with the orange inner border irregular, without sharply defined indentations. Correction: Can also have well-defined indentations.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/eb/f8...39954e89f6.jpg
https://www.flickr.com/photos/scapeview/11620404596/
https://thaibutterflies.com/wp-conte...a-limborgi.jpg
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/nym/760350001.html
TL Seow: Cheers.
Last edited by Psyche; 23-Oct-2019 at 06:51 AM.
-
22-Oct-2019, 11:21 AM
#20
Yes, they are very confusing! Thanks Dr Seow for the ID confirmation
Loh Mei Yee
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules