Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: Is this Psuedoborbo bevani?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    India
    Posts
    96

    Default

    Hmmm..... the going gets tougher as we move forward eh Dr. Seow !

    Thanks for all the knowledge.
    Regards gkbaliga

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    India
    Posts
    96

    Default

    Is it possible to id this one Dr. Seow.

    Please bear with my lack of knowledge / experience. There are only two spots on UNH and it looks as if there are spot / spots in cell.
    Looking at the discal spots, it seems to me as not a P. Bevani (But I am not sure)

    Could it be a totally different genus? Looking for guidance.

    Blank by GKBaliga, on Flickr
    Regards gkbaliga

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    6,864

    Default

    It is still P. bevani.
    There is som smudges but no FW cellspot.
    The UnH of bevani can a varying nos. of spots & sometimes none.
    FW spot 3 is equidistant from spot 2 & 4 ; antenna without a pale area just below the club.

    Compare with Caltoris kumara which always without cellspot. FW spot 3 is nearer spot 2; antenna with a pale area just below the club.
    http://www.flutters.org/home/photoga...rgodbole_1.jpg
    https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...be3eeb85-1.jpg

    TL Seow: Cheers.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    India
    Posts
    96

    Default

    Hmm....
    I need to still learn a lot. I will remember to look at the antenna before jumping to any conclusions, one of the basic mistakes I was making.

    Regarding : "FW spot 3 is nearer spot 2", I had the impression that this is one of the characteristics of P. Bevani.
    Now I am learning it is so for Caltoris Kumara.


    Thank you so much Dr. Seow.
    Regards gkbaliga

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    6,864

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gkbaliga View Post
    Hmm....
    I need to still learn a lot. I will remember to look at the antenna before jumping to any conclusions, one of the basic mistakes I was making.

    Regarding : "FW spot 3 is nearer spot 2", I had the impression that this is one of the characteristics of P. Bevani.
    Now I am learning it is so for Caltoris Kumara.


    Thank you so much Dr. Seow.
    You are quite right here. It should be the other way round. ie in C. kumara, spot 3 is usually more nearly equidistant from spot 2 & 4.
    In P. bevani & B. cinnara spot 3 is a lot nearer spot 4 than spot 2.

    In a top down view especially , the pale area on the antennal shaft may not always be visible.

    Lastly the antennal club in both bevani & cinnara are much thicker.
    https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...6b8c920d-1.jpg
    https://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/me...Saji_ad960.jpg

    Putting it all together an ID correction is necessary.

    This does look good for Caltoris kumara kumara.


    TL Seow: Cheers.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    India
    Posts
    96

    Default

    I understnad these skippers are a tricky lot to identify, especially if we don't have enough shots from various angles.

    Thanks for everything Dr. Seow.
    Regards gkbaliga

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    India
    Posts
    96

    Default

    Thanks Dr.Seow. Learning things slowly one by one with your assistance.
    Regards gkbaliga

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Join us