These two are very difficult to separate in field shots.
Part of the blame is that in the net the IDs are all mixed up so that it is hard to gauge which is correct.
The main difference are ,B. cinara UnH spots sharply defined; antennal shaft mostly dark; UpF spots 2 & 3 irregular. P. bevani ;UnH spotspoorly defined ,blurry; antennal shaft paler, often with a pale area behind the club; UpF spots smaller & rounded.
Your shot with sharply defined HW spots & dark antennae indicate it is a female Borbo cinnara.
Could this be Caltoris Kumara Dr Seow? Both photos of the same individual. Shot in our garden, Mangalore, Coastal Area of Karnataka State, India September 2018
Wings are broad, only two supapical spots in FW, Spot 2,3,4 almost equidistant. Apparently no spot on UNH