After seeing a good example of Arhopala kurzi in the Panti thread, I realised I had fail to double-check along the key further up,by ignoring the position of spot 4.
Anyway this Arhopala (tentative ID hypomuta ) was in the back of my mind as not being right.
Post 3.
Arhopala Danum 1 A. similis correct.
Arhopala Danum 2 A. epimuta correct.
Arhopala Danum 3 FW spot 4 distinctly shifted out; orange tip antenna.
Post 8 LD 3 below FW spot 4 barely shifted out; antennal tip orange.
Following key line 55, 59, 63, 71, 77, 82, 84, 86, 87, 90/91
This is either A. muta or moorei .
Note the FW is raised high & spot 2 can be seen staggered (in echelon) with spot 3.
Arhopala Danum 3 is the same species. (The dislocation of FW spot 4 is quite variable from none to distinct.)
The difference between these 2 species are very slight in Borneo as stated in C&P4.
Note the A muta male below have the orange tip antenna (probably fresh)
Note variable dislocation of FW spot 4 in all examples. Spots 2 & 3 are variably staggered.
http://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...iMFUpUnAC1.jpg
http://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...iMFUpUnAC1.jpg
TL Seow